Brigham-Houston Ch. 14 · Dividend Theories, Payout Ratios, Stock Splits, Repurchase Methods & Residual Dividend Model · 2-Week Unit
| Criterion | Excellent (Full) | Proficient (Partial) | Developing (Minimal) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part (a) — Residual Dividend Model Equity needed = $600,000 × 60% = $360,000 · Residual = $500,000 − $360,000 = $140,000 · DPS = $140,000 ÷ 200,000 = $0.70 · Payout ratio = $0.70 ÷ $2.50 = 28% |
All four steps correct: equity needed $360K, residual $140K, DPS $0.70, payout ratio 28% | Three of four steps correct; minor arithmetic error | Correct formula used but fewer than two values correct | /6 |
| Part (b) — Dividend Yield Dividend Yield = $0.70 ÷ $25.00 = 2.8% |
Dividend yield = 2.8% correctly calculated with formula shown | Correct formula; uses wrong DPS from Part (a) error but method is right | Formula missing or yield not expressed as percentage | /4 |
| Part (c) — Share Repurchase EPS Analysis Shares repurchased = $140,000 ÷ $25 = 5,600 shares · New shares = 200,000 − 5,600 = 194,400 · New EPS = $500,000 ÷ 194,400 = $2.572 (vs. $2.50 before) |
All three values correct: 5,600 shares repurchased, 194,400 remaining, new EPS ≈ $2.57; EPS increase explained | Repurchase count and new shares correct; EPS calculation minor error or not explained | Only one step correct or EPS effect not discussed | /5 |
| Part (d) — Policy Recommendation | Recommends hybrid approach: cash dividend satisfies income-focused retirees (Clientele Effect), repurchase benefits growth investors (tax preference); references Signaling Theory — a consistent dividend signals financial health to the community; uses ≥4 underlined vocabulary terms | Defensible recommendation; mentions clientele or signaling but not both; fewer than 4 vocabulary terms | Recommendation without theory support or no vocabulary terms | /5 |
Sections 1 & 2 auto-grade instantly. Use the rubric selectors for Sections 3 & 4.