Brigham-Houston Ch. 19 · Options, Futures, Swaps, Hedging Strategies & the Black-Scholes Model · 2-Week Unit
| Criterion | Excellent (Full) | Proficient (Partial) | Developing (Minimal) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part (a) — Futures Hedge Design & Net Costs Go LONG 5 contracts (500 tons ÷ 100 tons/contract) · Scenario A: Futures gain = (900−820)×500 = $40,000; Cash cost = 900×500 = $450,000; Net = $450K−$40K = $410K → $820/ton · Scenario B: Futures loss = (820−750)×500 = $35,000; Cash cost = 750×500 = $375,000; Net = $375K+$35K = $410K → $820/ton · Hedge locks in $820/ton in both scenarios |
Long 5 contracts stated; both net costs correct at $820/ton with gain/loss shown; "locks in" interpretation | Correct direction (long) and contract count; one scenario correct; minor arithmetic | Direction correct but contract count wrong, or only one scenario attempted | /7 |
| Part (b) — Interest Rate Swap BSS pays fixed 7%, bank pays floating (SOFR+2%) · If SOFR rises to 5%: floating = 7%; net settlement = 0 (7%−7%); BSS is protected from higher cost · If SOFR stays at 4%: floating = 6%; net: BSS pays extra 1% on $1M = $10,000/year to swap counterparty — the cost of insurance against rate rises |
BSS pays fixed / counterparty pays floating clearly stated; both settlement calculations correct; motivation explained (protection vs. cost of protection) | Swap direction correct; one settlement correct; partial motivation | Swap concept misapplied; no settlement calculations | /5 |
| Part (c) — Call Option Comparison Call option: pay $15/ton premium = $15×500 = $7,500 total · Scenario A (S=$900 > K=$820): exercise call; net cost = 820+15 = $835/ton → $417,500 total · Scenario B (S=$750 < K=$820): don't exercise; buy at spot $750; net cost = 750+15 = $765/ton → $382,500 total · Advantage: options allow benefit from price decline (Scenario B cheaper) · Disadvantage: upfront premium cost; effective floor is $835 not $820 |
Both option net costs correct; one advantage (asymmetric payoff — can benefit if price falls) and one disadvantage (premium paid upfront regardless) clearly stated | One net cost correct; advantage or disadvantage stated but not both | Premium calculation only; no comparison to futures | /4 |
| Part (d) — Strategic Recommendation | Recommends futures for steel (certainty, no premium cost, $820/ton locked) + interest rate swap (converts unpredictable floating rate to fixed 7%, enabling accurate cash flow planning); argues that thin-margin community businesses cannot absorb commodity or rate spikes — derivatives convert uncertainty into planned costs; ≥4 underlined vocabulary terms used professionally | Recommendation includes both derivatives; partial reasoning; some vocabulary terms | Only one derivative addressed; no community business rationale; fewer than 2 vocabulary terms | /4 |
Sections 1 & 2 auto-grade instantly. Use the rubric selectors for Sections 3 & 4.